LapLink vs Tranxition for PC Migration

This post compares LapLink vs Tranxition for PC Migration. The respective websites are web.laplink.com and Tranxition.com

Both LapLink and Tranxition have vender direct support.

The biggest and most significant difference between the two products is speed. For a 10GB migration Tranxition comes in at 0H:29M and LapLink at 2HR:00M to 14H:00M.

Both Tranxition’s Migration Manager and LapLink supports transfer between domains.

Both LapLink and Tranxition have phone and email support.

Recently Used Files Recreated: LapLink – no. Tranxition – yes.

Complete Outlook Migration: LapLink – no. Tranxition – yes.

SCCM Support LapLink – yes. Tranxition – yes.

Comparing costs: LapLink comes in at $59.95/1 and Tranxition coming in at $19.95/1.

We hope that this comparison will help you in your IT decision journey.

IE vs Tranxition for PC Migration

This post compares 1E vs Tranxition for PC Migration. The respective websites are 1E.com and Tranxition.com

Both 1E and Tranxition support multiple user profiles and have zero-touch automation. 

In speed 1E comes in at 1H:40M and Tranxition at 0H:29M.

The biggest and most significant difference between the two products is reported reliability with 1E coming in at 29 percent errors, and Tranxition at 99.9 percent reliability.

Tranxition’s Migration Manager completely supports transfer between domains. 1E’s support for this functionality is partial.

In terms of vendor direct support: 1E No (for migration) but Tranxition does offer vendor direct support.

Recently Used Files Recreated:   1E – no Tranxition – yes.

Complete Outlook Migration:  1E – no Tranxition – yes.

SCCM Support    1E – partial Tranxition – yes.

Costs are similar with 1E coming in at $15/Migration and Tranxition coming in at $19.95/1.

We hope that this comparison will help your IT decision process.

What is and do you need a registered agent?

A registered agent is a responsible third-party that is located within the same state as the business that is able to receive service of process notices, correspondence from the Secretary of State, and various other official government notifications on behalf of the corporation or LLC.

“The registered agent for a business entity may be an officer or employee of the company, or a third party, such as the organization’s lawyer or a service company. Failure to properly maintain a registered agent can affect a company negatively.” Wikipedia

CharlesJones.com can provide this nationwide or internationally through corporate affiliation with NRAI.

Negative Keywords for Dentists

If you are running Google Ads or Bing Ads, clicks for dentists in PPC can be expensive. Especially if your budget is limited, it is very important to use negative phrases to weed out clicks coming from user queries that are not really looking for you. One type of query to eliminate are queries that are looking for a specific known dentist. Using negatives such as blvd, street, corner of, dds etc. can help eliminate the people that are just looking for a specific phone number. Similarly, ‘phone number for’ is a good negative for the same reason. Other queries can be people poking around by not near making a commitment. If your budget is especially low you may want to exclude: cost of, price, how much does, cost for implants, root canal cost, etc. Of course, exclude salary, employment, training, course, job, intern, resume, hiring, etc. Watch your query report, daily at first, and weed out unwanted queries. This will constantly improve the effectiveness of your spend.

Google Favors Brands

Google is built around a bias toward brands in their search rankings. They consider something to be a brand if people are actually looking for the particular website by queries in the search box or direct traffic from typing in the address bar. This bias favors larger advertising budgets because people become aware and return to find the website. There is a clear short term advantage to Google in this brand emphasis. That is it forces players to take out ads so as not to be buried by Amazon, Wikipedia, NYTimes.com and other clear brands. The constant shake up of the algorithm also favors Google in making companies less confident in transitory rankings.

This is all unfortunate for the consumer because instead of the beauty of a beach area main street where people gather to visit the mom and pop shops and interesting ‘hole in the wall’ finds, they are presented the big box franchise same as always stuff that cities force by their zoning. More and more it has become less of a ‘search engine’ and more of a giant yellow pages with the big players first.

test test